| Apical Ectodermal Ridge | |
| The Apical Ectodermal Ridge (AER) controls identity along the proximal/distal axis. The AER is a ridge of thickened ectoderm that forms along the entire edge of the limb bud at the dorsal/ventral boundary. This thickened ridge is analogous to ectodermal placodes in that each are areas of thickened ectoderm created by cell shape changes and they each signal to the underlying mesoderm. The mesoderm underlying the AER is called the Progress Zone. | |
| Experiment | Overview |
|---|---|
| Removal | The AER was removed from the limb at various times. This resulted in limb truncations. Thus, the AER signals the underlying mesenchyme to allow proximal/distal outgrowth. Late removes results in only the most distal elements (ie, digits) missing; early removal results in more proximal elements also missing. Thus, proximal-distal patterning occurs progressively over time with proximal elements forming first. |
| Hybridization | In situ hybridization was used to determine what factors are expressed by the AER. Among those factors were FGF-4 and -8. To test if these are the factors responsible for AER’s proximal-distal patterning activity, implantation of beads was performed in embryos stripped of their AER. |
| Implantation | The AER was removed and beads soaked in FGF-8 were implanted. The implanted beads were nearly as effective as the AER itself. Thus, the AER is clearly a signaling center that secretes FGFs to induce underlying mesenchyme. |
| Zone of Polarizing Activity | |
| The Zone of Polarizing Activity (aka ZPA or Polarizing Region) controls identity along the anterior/posterior axis (and thus digit identity). It is a mesenchyme located at the posterior end of the limb bud. Digit 1 is most anterior numeration proceeds posteriorly. | |
| Experiment | Overview |
|---|---|
| Transplantation | A ZPA was grafted to an ectopic anterior position. This caused formation of a new anterior/posterior axis. This is similar to the grafting of the frog embryo DBL to an ectopic position to induce a new dorsal/ventral axis with a new neural tube and complete set of structures. The interpretation for the ZPA results is the same as in the DBL results: the grafted tissue must be a source of a secreted signal that acts upon neighboring cell. |
| Hybridization | In situ hybridization identified Shh as the potential signal secreted by the ZPA. |
| Implantation | Implanting a bead soaked with Shh at the anterior end of the limb will cause the limb to form with two anterio-posterior axes as though it were a reflection of itself. |
| Formation of structures along the anterio-posterior axis is dependent on the concentration of Shh. Naturally, the [Shh] is highest posteriorly where the ZPA is located. Adding a source of Shh at the anterior end will form a concentration gradient that is high anteriorly and posteriorly and intermediate in the middle. Mutations that lead to ectopic Shh are the most frequent cause of limb/digit duplication. | |
| Progress Zone, Part I | |
| The Progress Zone controls identity along the proximo-distal axis. The Progress Zone is the limb mesenchyme directly underneath the AER. The proximal/distal fate of a cell is determined by the amount of time it spends in the Progress Zone. Outgrowth of the limb is proximal→distal, meaning proximal structures develop first and distal structures last. | |
| In the early limb bud most mesenchymal cells are in the Progress Zone. However, as cells divide and the limb grows, more and more cells are found outside of the Progress Zone. They only begin to differentiate once outside the Progress Zone. This is similar to the nervous system, where progenitor cells only differentiate after leaving the ventricular proliferative zone. | |
| Experiment | Overview |
|---|---|
| Labeling | Different cells are labeled with different markers. This reveals that as development proceeds, cells in the Progress Zone proliferate. As they proliferate, some cells are pushed out of the Progress Zone. Cells pushed out first become proximal structures. As limb development proceeds, cells i the Progress Zone continue to proliferate and additional cells are pushed out. |
| Progress Zone, Part II | |
| Since the amount of time spent in the Progress Zone fates a cell along the proximal/distal axis, the labeling experiment explains why removing the AER at an early stage leads to greater limb truncations. | |
| Transplantation | An early Progress Zone was transplanted onto a late limb bud. Many cells had already left the host’s late Progress Zone. Grafting a new Progress Zone onto the tip of the limb caused a new population of cells to proliferate and leave the Progress Zone as the host cells had. The result is duplication of structures. |
|---|---|
| Transplantation | An early limb bud Progress Zone was removed and replaced with a late limb bud Progress Zone. Only the most proximal structures had time to leave the host Progress Zone. The donor Progress Zone was only left with the most distally determined cells. This resulted in a loss of intermediate limb elements. |
We have seen that the ZPA produces Shh and controls A/P identity.
The PZ and AER control P/D outgrowth.
The PZ produces FGF10 and the AER produces FGF8.
The new concept I want to introduce is that these signaling centers interact to maintain each other. For example, in addition to controlling A/P identity, Shh also acts on the PZ to to maintain its survival.
Similarly, the FGF10 produced by the PZ maintains the AER.
Finally, the FGF8 produced by the AER acts on both the PZ and the ZPA to maintain these structures.
1. Removal of AER stops formation of distal structures
2. Removal of AER causes loss of ZPA activity
3. Replacement of PZ mesoderm with flank
mesoderm causes degeneration of AER
4. Removal of ZPA causes loss of formation of distal structures (i.e. PZ activity and AER activity)
There are some experiments that tell us that the PZ, AER, and ZPA interact to maintain each other.
For example, we have seen that removal of AER blocks formation of distal structures. This suggests it is required to maintain the PZ.
Next, removal of the Aer also causes a loss of ZPA activity. Shh expression is lost. This shows the AER is required to maintain the ZPA.
The role of the PZ on maintaining the AER can be seen if we replace the PZ mesoderm with other flank mesoderm. This other mesoderm is unable to maintain the AER.
Finally, removal of the ZPA causes a loss in the formation of distal structures.
To review, as I mentioned earlier, the limb bud consists of mesenchymal cells arising from the lateral plate mesoderm, and an epithelial covering coming from the ectoderm. It is at this early stage of development, before any cell differentiation takes place, that different parts of the limb bud begin to produce signals that control development along the P/D and A/P axes. The basic point here is that these signaling sends transmit information to cells in the limb bud at an early stage of development, and it isn’t until much later that cells start to differentiate into different skeletal elements at specific locations, depending on the signals they received earlier.
Hox genes are expressed along the anterio-posterior axis. Hindlimbs and forelimbs appear at different places along the anterio-posterior axis. Furthermore, hindlimbs and forelimbs have different identity. Hox gene expression is responsible for this, as it induces various Tbx genes which the mesodermal mesenchyme conferring regional specificity to the overlying ectoderm.
Evidence for existence of a “prepattern”: digits can form in absence of polarizing activity
A final feature I want to mention to you is that the ability of the limb mesenchyme to form segmented structures is instrinsic to the limb bud cells themselves. If we take the cells, diserse them so that we no longer have any gradients of FGF or Shh, and then put them back into an ectodermal limb jacket, a disorganized limb will grow out, but what is striking is that it has recognizable digits composed on individual bones. So the e ability to form a repeated segmental structure is present and doesn’t involve gradients of the patterning molecules we already discussed. This is somewhat reminiscient of the situation with the somites, where we saw the somite formation occurs due to an oscillation of a negative feedback pathway.
Picture 7
Generating Periodic Structures
Reaction-diffusion mechanisms: a form of lateral inhibition established by negative feedback loops.
Observations of this sort have led to the theory that reaction-diffusion mechanisms are involved. These are related to the negative feedback pathway we discussed for somite formation.
The difference is in the reaction diffusion mechanism, the activator protein that gets induced is stable, but it forms a concentration gradient.
Forelimb vs Hindlimb is determined by Tbx = T box (DNA binding domain) transcription factor. Tbx5 determines wing bud and Tbx4 determines leg bud. In the previous slide, we saw that the mesoderm differentiates according to its own developmental program, which was to make leg structures. The positional signals for regional identity must be present in the mesoderm. This implies that there is differential gene expression in wing vs leg.
Whether a hindlimb or forelimb develops is determined very early, by the time a limb bud is evident. The identity will be under the control of Hox genes, since limb identity depends on where on the AP axis the limb bud develops.
Limb identity is determined by the ability of Hox genes to activate the expression of Tbx genes. These are transcription factors. The Tbx genes that control limb identity are Tbx4 and Tbx5.
Now we’ll look at some experiments that demonstrate that Tbx genes control limb identity.
One way to look at this is to induce an ectopic limb to see what type of limb develops, either forelimb or hindlimb, and then to correlate that with the expression of Tbx4 or Tbx5.
In this experiment, a limb bud can be induced in the lateral plate mesoderm by implantation of a bead soaked in FGF. In this case, the bead is implanted in a location where Tbx5 is induced, and the limb develops as a wing.
However, infecting lateral mesoderm with a virus that causes overexpression of Tbx4 will override the normal course of development by altering expression patterns of Tbx genes. Tbx4 is overexpressed in the flank mesoderm by introducing a vector containing a Tbx4 gene. The limb but that now deelops expressed high levels of Tbx4, the gene normally expressed in hindlimb bud. The wing bud now develops into a leg instead of a wing.
We have seen that the PZ controls P-D identity. This must involve differential gene expression. We have already seen that Hox genes control identity along the A/P axis of the embryo and the positioning of the limb buds. They also control identity along the P/D and A/P axis in the limb.
The expression patterns change during development. However, if we look at the expression of Hoxa9 through Hoxa13 in an early limb bud, we can see a colinearity of expression, with the most distal regions expressing the most members of the complex.
Evidence that Hox genes are involved in P/D patterning comes from looking at the phenotypes of mice in which Hox genes are knocked out. For example, were is a normal mouse forelimb. In this mutant, all of the Hox11 genes (hoxa11, d11,etc) are defective. As a result of having no normal Hox11, the foreleg (radius and ulna are almost completely missing).
What we don’t see are homeotic transformations.
Here is an example of a Hox mutation in humans. As we saw in the previous slide, Hoxa13 is expressed in the most distal cells in the limb. In people lacking hoxa13, it is the most distal elements, the digits, that are affected. The types of malformations are complicated and not understood on a molecular level.
What is important is not the type of malformation, but rather the type of structure that is affected by a particular Hox mutation. So, the Hox genes that show the most distally restricted expression affect the most distal limb elements. Hox genes like Hoxd11 that show a more proximal range of expression affect more proximal structures.
| A series of experiments in fetal rabbits led to the conclusion that the sex of the gonad controlled the development of all other sexual characteristics. These experiments showed: | |
| Removed | Overview |
|---|---|
| Testes | Removing testes from a male fetus will cause it to develop a female phenotype without gonads. |
| Ovaries | Removing ovaries from a female fetus will cause it to develop a female phenotype without gonads. |
| Conclusion: The ground state is female. Testis are required for male differentiation. Without testis then the phenotype is female. | |
| These results led to the hypothesis that a substance produced by the male gonad causes male differentiation. We now know that the key products of the testes that allow male development of secondary sexual characteristics are hormones. | |
| Injection | Overview |
|---|---|
| Testosterone | Testosterone injected into female fetuses will cause them to develop as males, except that the ovary does not differentiate into a testis and produce sperm, and the paramesonephric (Mullerian) ducts do not degenerate. |
| Estrogen | Estrogen injected into fetuses will not cause any change in the fetus’ development. Males still develop as males and females as females. |
| AMH | Regression of the Mullerian ducts in the male is under the control of anti-Mullerian duct hormone (AMH, a TGF-β) secreted by testis’ Sertoli cells. |
Conclusion: The development of the male phenotype in mammals depends on the development of the testis, which then controls secondary sexual development by producing testosterone and AMH. As a side-note, testosterone is secreted by the Leydig cells of the testis and estrogen is produced by the ovary.
The gene SRY has been cloned from the human Y chromosome and is required to confer maleness in mammals. This gene has a close homolog in mice, is expressed in gonad at the time of testis differentiation, is not expressed in ovaries, and is a DNA or RNA-binding protein. Transgenic SRY mice always had a male phenotype even when they had an XX genotype. However, male XXSRY were incapable of spermatogenesis since sperm cell differentiation requires additional Y chromosome proteins. This shows that the presence of the SRY gene is sufficient to drive almost all aspects of male sexual differentiation.
Sox9 is an autosomal gene necessary for maleness in all vertebrates. Sox9-/- causes a female phenotype regardless of genotype. The current hypothesis is that in mammals and marsupials, SRY controls the expression of Sox9. The role of Sox9 as a determinant of testes formation appears to be conserved among all vertebrates. This is true even in vertebrates other than mammals, which do not have the Sry gene. It is not known why expression of Sox9 came under the control of Sry in mammals. In vertebrates such as fish and reptiles, where sex is determined by hormones or the temperature at which the embryo develops, it is thought that Sox9 activity is influenced by sex hormones.
Researchers have not deciphered how sex is determined in animals that use a ZW system (including birds). This is largely due to the impossibility genetic screens or other genetic manipulations in birds. However, RNAi has revealed that the DNA-binding protein DMRT1 is sex-determining. DMRT1 is required for the gonad to differentiate as a testis in birds. Interestingly, DMRT1 is highly conserved. It is expressed in mammals and in Drosophila its homolog (Doublesex) determines sex in flies. As a side-note, monotreme mammals (egg layers such as platypus and echidna) use a ZW system, indicating that the XY system evolved rather recently.
| Endoderm | Epithelial lining of respiratory tract and GI tract. | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesoderm |
There are dorsal/ventral differences in what the mesoderm gives rise to. This is induced by differences in dorsal and ventral endoderm. Organizer cells self-diffrentiate into dorsal mesoderm (notochord), organizer cells dorsalize adjacent mesoderm to for paraxial mesoderm (somites) and organizer cells secrete dorsalizing signals (noggin, chordin, nodal-related, etc) to induce the neural plate. The cardiovascular system, reproductive/excretory organs, connective tissues, vessels and skeleton. In mnemonic form: mesothelium (peritoneal, pleural, pericardial), muscle (striated, smooth, cardiac), spleen, soft tissues, serous linings, sarcoma, somite, osseous tissue, outer layer of suprarenal gland (cortex), ovaries, dura mater, dducts of genitalia, endothelium, renal (kidney), microglia, mesenchyme, male gonad (MMSSSSSOOODDERMMM). |
||||||
| Ectoderm |
The surface of the ectoderm and its neural plate give rise to different tissues.
|
||||||
Note that all three germ layers are derived from the epiblast. Furthermore, epithelium is derived from all three germ layers: endoderm (epithelial lining inside viscera); mesoderm (mesothelial lining outside of viscera); and ectoderm (skin epithelium).
| D/V Axis | The DLB dorsalizes surrounding tissue, thus forming (along with the SEP) the dorsal-ventral axis. In addition to dorsalizing surrounding tissue, the primary organizer: fates overlying ectoderm as neural plate tissue; and is determined to be notochord tissue. Dorsalized tissue gives rise to somites and pronephric tubules. |
|---|---|
| A/P Axis | By inducing neurectoderm, it makes ectodermal cells competent to receive patterning signals from the non-organizer mesoderm and thereby enable the formation of a complete and stable AP pattern along the trunk |
| Experiments Demonstrating Role | |
| 1 | Marginal zone cells do not form mesoderm when isolated and cultured until after the 64-cell stage. |
|---|---|
| 2 | Removing the marginal zone and recombining animal and vegetal caps, dorsal mesoderm arises from animal cap cells nearest the vegetal cap, and vegetal cells opposite the SEP. |
| 3 | Recombining animal caps with various vegetal blastomeres: dorsal vegetal blastomere cells induced dorsal mesoderm; ventral vegetal blastomere cells induced ventral mesoderm. Also, dorsal mesoderm induced ventral mesoderm to become lateral mesoderm. Thus, signaling must be involved in dorsal and central cell fates. |
| 4 | Fertilized eggs did not form a D/V axis when irradiated at the vegetal pole, but could be restored by a single vegetal- and dorsal-most cell. Thus, this vegetal- and dorsal-most structure must induce other regions to become dorsal mesoderm. This vegetal-most and dorsal-most region first induces the primary organizer (which then induces other tissues) and was called the Nieuwkoop center. |
| 5 | To determine which part of the embryo acts to organize the mesoderm into dorsal structure and to induce neural tube formation, the dorsal lip of the blastopore of an early gastrula from a light-colored newt was transplanted into an early gastrula of a dark-colored newt. The donor tissue formed a second embryonic axis. The notochord of this second embronic axis was composed entirely of graft (donor) tissue, while the neural tube and somites were composed only partly of graft (donor) tissue and the kidney tubules and gut of the new axis were composed entirely of host tissue. Spemann and Mangold concluded that the graft tissue induced a new embryonic axis. This structure is named Primary organizer. |
The Nieuwkoop Center is the dorsal- and vegetal-most cell of the early blastula. It gives rise to the Spemann Organizer, which is the dorsal lip of the blastopore. The Spemann Organizer has a dorsalizing effect, and together with the Sperm Entry Point (SEP) gives rise to the dorsal/ventral axis.
The first signals are the vegetal maternal mRNAs Veg1 and VegT. The second signal is the dorsal-most protein β-catenin, which accumulates via cortical rotation. This induces formation of the Spemann Organizer and the Nieuwkoop Center. The Spemann Organizer is responsible for the third signal by expressing Noggin, Chordin and Follistatin, which bind and inhibit the ventralizing factors BMP-4 and Frzb.
Drosophila Dpp is homologous to BMP-4. Dpp activity is highest at the dorsal region. Drosophila Sog is homologous to Chordin. [Sog] is highest at the ventral region, where it binds and inactivates Dpp. These Drosophila genes can be replaced by their Xenopus homologs, but their activity along the dorsal-ventral axis is inverted. This switching occurred in a vertebrate ancestor. Also, Drosophila Wingless is homologous to Wnt-8.
Starting at the ventral end, the following structures comprise the spinal cord: floor plate; cell bodies of somatic motor neurons; cell bodies of commisural neurons; roof plate. The floor plate guides axons that grow into it, and the motor neurons send out axons that innervate muscles.
The notochord patterns the neural tube’s dorso-ventral axis. An additional notochord transplanted underneath a closing neural tube in the chick embryo induces an additional floorplate with adjacent motor neurons. Removing the notochord from the neural tube results in absence of a floor plate and motor neurons. Thus, the notochord induces at least the most dorsal neural tube structures. Furthermore, both the notochord and floorplate induce adjacent somite tissue into sclerotome, which gives rise to the vertebrae and ribs.
Vertebrate Sonic hedgehog protein (Shh, homolog of Drosophila Hedgehog) is localized to the notochord and floorplate of the spinal cord. Perhaps Shh is the notochord signal that patterns the neural tube in dorso-ventral axis, and that patterns the somites. Addition of cells producing Shh has a similar effect to adding an additional notochord: an ectopic floorplate and motor neurons. The floorplate differentiates where the level of ectopic Shh is highest and the motor neurons where the level is lower. This indicates that a gradient of Shh released from the notochord patterns the neural tube.
The key role of Sonic hedgehog was revealed by the phenotype of Sonic hedgehog knockout mice. Shh-/- mice die early and are extremely defective. The defects observed are consistent with a role of Shh in inductions:
| Floorplate | Shh form the notochord induces the floorplate. Shh-/- fetuses have severe ventral midline defects, i. e., the ventral midline seems to degenerate. This results in a fusion of the eye and nose primordia in the ventral midline (cyclopia). This defect is consistent with the known role of Shh in inducing the formation of the floorplate and other ventral cell types in the neural tube. |
|---|---|
| Sclerotomes | Shh from the notochord and floor induces sclerotomes. Another defect is the virtual absence of the vertebrae and the ribs. Again, this is consistent with the role of Shh in giving a more ventral identity (sclerotome) to a portion of each somite. We will discuss this aspect of Shh signaling in a future lecture. |
Hox genes and head gap genes
Neural crest cells form at the anterior end of the neural plate, at the border of the epidermis and neural plate. This is where BMP levels are intermediate. Sensory placodes arise from this region and are induced by the same signals. Neural crest cells migrate through the anterior half of the somite but avoid the posterior half due to repulsive ephrin signals from somite’s posterior half.
Neural crest cells form dorsal root ganglia (sensory neurons) and melanocytes (pigment cells). Dorsal root ganglia form the adrenal medula and also sympathetic ganglia in the gut. Other neural crest derivatives are head mesenchyme and Schwann cells. Head mesenchyme includes bones, connective tissue and dental papilae (tooth pulp). Schwann cells myelinate peripheral neurons.
When Neural Crest Cells begin to migrate, they lose their adhesion to the neural tube and adjacent epidermis. This involves losing expression of both N-cadherin and E-cadherin.
Neural Crest Cells are guided by similar mechanisms as axons, consisting of short-range (cell-surface) and long-range (diffusible) signals of attraction and repulsion.
Short-range attractive cues include cadherins; short-range repulsive cues include ephrins. Ephrins are recognized by neural crest ephrin receptors. The posterior half of each somite expresses ephrin, relegating neural crest cells to migrate through the anterior half of each somit.
Long-range attractive cues include netrins. Long-range repulsive cues include semaphorins.
The extracellular matrix is the substrate over which a neural crest cell migrates. The cells bind primarily to laminin and secondarily to fibronectin and collagen. Cues guide neural crest cells across the extracellular matrix.
Ephrins are short-range repulsive cues to prevent cell mixing between adjacent somites. The posterior half of the somite produces a repulsive signal called ephrin. Loss of Ephrin-B1 induces NCC migration defects.
Retinal neurons send a bundle of axons (the optic nerve) to precise locations in the tectum (a region of the brain). The precisely ordered connections are known as a retino-tectal map. This map is broadly established by a gradient of ephrin and ephrin receptors, and refined by additional interactions.
Retinal neurons express the ephrin EphA3 in a graded fashion, with the highest levels on the side furthest from the nose. A corresponding gradient of ephrins A2 and A5 is seen in the tectum, where the lowest [ephrins] is at the anterior side and the highest [ephrins] is at the posterior side.
Retinal neurons from the nasal side of the retina express low levels of EphA3, and are thus insensitive to the repulsive effects of ephrins A2 and A5. They thus project only to the anterior side of the tectum. In contract retinal neurons furthest from the nose will project to the posterior side of the tectum to avoid repulsion.
If the optic nerve is severed and the eye rotated 180°, the retinotectal map will still form properly. This indicates that the retina and tectum release certain signals which define the retinotectal map, regardless of orientation.
The extracellular matrix is a substrate over which axonal growth cones can migrate. Laminin is the primary active component in the extracellular matrix, followed by fibronectin and collagen.
Netrins are long-range chemoattractants. They are secreted by floorplate cells, thus attracting neurons to the midline. Commisural neurons first extend ventrally, then project to netrin+/+ floorplate cells.
Floorplate or floorplate extract can be placed on agar. Axons within 250µm of this will reorientate their growth toward it. In netrin-/- knockouts, commisural axons fail to grow to the floorplate (midline).
Slit and semaphorin are repulsive cues. Netrin and slit signaling systems play opposing roles during positioning of longitudinal tracts along the midline in the ventral nerve cord of Drosophila embryos. Slit is present outside of the midline, and is taken up in a Roundabout (Robo) independent manner along the commissural tracts into the longitudinal connectives. Guidance is partially or fully ablated in null mutants of Slit or Robo.
Netrin draws commissural neuron growth cones toward the floorp-plate/midline. Then Slit (secreted by ventral midline) and Semaphorin (secreted by neural tube) divert the commisural neuron growth cones toward the brain. Thereby nerves extend themselves from the body to the brain. First they reach the midline due to the attractant Netrin, then they travel up to the brain along a narrow path defined by the repellents Slit and Semaphorin.
|
Conclusion: Pax6 is required in the lens ectoderm for lens induction (required for competence to respond). | ||||||||||||||||||
Hensen’s Node is present in birds and mammals. The Spemann Organizer is present in Xenopus. The Node establishes l
For example, we learned that the mesoderm that comes to occupy the most dorsal position in the embryo, the dorsal mesoderm, will become the notochord. Mesoderm that occupies more ventral positions go on to become other derivatives. For example, we also saw that the endoderm becomes surrounded by mesoderm, and that mesoderm is a more ventral type (the splanchnic mesoderm).
| Axial | It gives rise to the notochordal process which later becomes the notochord. |
|---|---|
| Paraxial | On either side of the neural tube lie bands of paraxial mesoderm. Paraxial mesoderm gives rise to somites. Somites form the vertebral column, dermis and skeletal muscle. Paraxial mesoderm also gives rise to branchial arches, which develop into facial muscle and cartilage. Paraxial mesoderm is exposed to BMP antagonists, but at a lesser concentration than dorsal axial mesoderm. Posterior paraxial mesoderm expresses high levels of FGF, thus keeping it in a proliferative and undifferentiated state. As the primitive streak regresses posteriorly, cells further from the node are no longer under the influence of FGF. Outside the reach of FGF, the paraxial mesoderm cells begin to compartmentalize into somites. Cells within an individual somite become compacted (which involves an increase in cadherin expression). These changes in cell adhesion cause the newly forming somite to separate from the rest of the paraxial mesoderm. |
| Intermediate | Intermediate mesoderm is located between the paraxial mesoderm and the lateral plate. It develops into the part of the urogenital system (kidneys and gonads). |
| Lateral Plate | This is ventral mesoderm and gives rise to limbs. |
| Discovery | |
| Transplant | Transplanting a small group of cells from a region that will eventually form a somite boundary, into a region of unsegmented paraxial mesoderm that normally would not be part of a boundary. |
|---|---|
| Result | Transplanted cells instruct the cells anterior to them to undergo a mesenchymal-epithelial transition and to separate from the unsegmented mesoderm. |
| Boundaries are signaling centers, and the somite boundary instructs neighboring cells to undergo a mesenchymal-epithelial transition. Nonboundary cells can acquire this ability to induce boundary formation if the Notch pathway is activated in them, for example, by introducing an activated Notch receptor. | |
| Mutations in Notch signaling lead to defects in somite formation. For example, mice lacking the Notch ligand Delta-like 3 (Dll3) have serious vertebral and rib defects. As we will see below, these structures are derived from somites. In Dll3-/- mice, somite formation is irregular and delayed. As a result the structures that form from the somites are abnormal. | |
Notch controls somite size and segmentation in a negative feedback pathway. The Notch pathway establishes an oscillating pattern in somites, and one cycle of the oscillation corresponds to the budding off of one somite from the unsegmented paraxial mesoderm. Notch signaling activates a transcription factor (RBJ) that activates the expression of Hes.
Hes is a transcriptional repressor that has two functions. First, it represses expression of itself. This limits the duration of the Notch response. Second, Hes represses expression of an inhibitor of the Notch receptor, lunatic fringe (Lfng). Thus, this activity of Hes would serve to activate the Notch pathway. The oscillations are created because Hes has a very short half-life, leading to transient repression of Notch.
When the somite first separates from the presomitic mesoderm, it can give rise to any somite-derived structure. As the somite matures, its various regions become committed to forming certain cell types.
| Somite | Region | Overview | ||||
| Sclerotome | Medial | Ventral-medial cells are farthest from the back but closest to the neural tube. These undergo mitosis and an epithelial-mesenchymal transition. They eventually become chondrocytes (cartilage cells) of the vertebrae and most (if not all) of each rib. The sclerotome is induced by paracrine factors, especially Shh, secreted from the notochord and neural tube floor plate. If any source of Shh is transplanted next to other regions of the somite, they too will become sclerotome cells. Sclerotome cells express Pax1, which induces them to differentiate into cartilage; also, pax1 is necessary for formation of the vertebrae. Sclerotome cells also express I-mf, an inhibitor of the myogenic bHLH family of transcription factors that initiate muscle formation. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dermamyotome | Lateral |
Cells in the two lateral portions of the epithelium (closest and farthest from the neural tube) give rise to dermamyotome, a double-layered structure composed of myotome in the lower layer and dermatome in in the upper layer.
|
||||
| Streak | Cells ingress into the streak via an epithelial→mesenchymal transition. |
|---|---|
| Somites | Somites go mesenchymal→epithelial to separate from the unsegmented mesoderm. |
| Sclerotome | Sclerotome goes epithelial→mesenchymal to generate chondrocytes of the vertebrae and most (if not all) of the ribs. |
| Dermatome | Dermatome goes epithelial→mesenchymal to generate mesenchymal connective tissue of the back dermis. |
In Drosophila, the dorsal-ventral patterning system causes a ventro-lateral portion of the blastoderm layer to become committed to a neurectodermal fate. The presumptive neurectodermal cells develop from nuclei that contain moderate levels of nuclear dorsal protein. Following cellularization of the blastoderm and the onset of zygotic gene expression, these cells express Sog, an inhibitor of DPP. The neurectoderm in the Drosophila embryo consists of two lateral stripes on either side of the embryo. These stripes are separated ventrally by the presumptive mesoderm (twist-expressing cells). Following invagination and internalization of the mesoderm, the presumptive neurectoderm comes to occupy the most ventral position in the embryo.
| Proneural | Proneural clusters are groups of neuroectoderm that become competent to give rise to neuroblasts. This is due to their activation of proneural gene expression. Proneural genes a group of bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix) transcription factors encoded by the Achaete-scute complex. The requirement for the proneural genes is shown by the fact that many neuroblasts do not appear in Achaete-scute-/- embryos. |
|---|---|
| Inhibition | One of the cells that has delaminated from the proneural cluster inhibits other cells of the cluster from becoming neuroblasts. This process is called lateral inhibition, and it is important for assuring that the correct number of cells become neuroblasts. |
|
|